But Newton found the concept uniquely useful, and made it as little occult as possible by treating it from the mechanical point of view. Newton's ideas on the possible mechanism of attraction were never definitely worked out.
Nicolay and Hay undertook a peculiarly difficult task in writing a biography2 which at the same time was to be a complete history of the greatest crisis in the life of this republic. The biographer may content himself with sketching an historical background to set forth and render intelligible the char- acter and career of the person to be portrayed; and that sketch may be more restricted or more comprehensive as the events and conditions described are more or less significant in their relation to the central figure.
The historian has to present conditions and events, as well as the persons concerned in them, in just proportion to their historic importance. A biography which is to fulfill the pur- pose of a history will be in danger of oppressing the biographical portrait with the size and elaborateness of the frame.
The history whose main object is bi- ography will be apt to sacrifice to the biographical purpose that just propor- tion and symmetry in the treatment of men and things which true history es- sentially demands. While the authors of this comprehen- sive biography of Lincoln could hard- ly be expected completely to overcome the difficulties inherent in their under- taking, they have indeed succeeded in producing a work which, both as a bi- ography and a history, is of high value.
They enjoyed the great advantage of having been eye-witnesses to many of Copyright,by Carl Schurz. By JOHN the occurrences they relate; of having stood in confidential relations to not a few of the foremost personages of the time; of having been intimate daily companions of Lincoln himself during his presidency; and of commanding a mass of documentary material hitherto not accessible to other writers.
Of this advantage they have made excellent use in bringing out new facts of historic importance, and in shedding new light upon others which were only imperfect- ly known. We cannot follow them in all their reasoning, nor accept their judgment in every case as impartial, least of all in their treatment of some of the persons grouped around the princi- pal character.
In their presentation of Chases conduct, for instance, they trans- gress all the limits of fairness. But, on the whole, the merit of the contribution they have made to the history of a most important period cannot be too highly acknowledged. It is to be regretted that a somewhat diffuse style has swelled what should be a popular book into the formidable bulk of ten stout volumes, which only persons of means are able to buy, and from the reading of which only a man of leisure will not recoil.
Especially when speak- ing of their hero, the authors seem to lose all restraint. On every possible occasion, the reader is reminded, with great redundancy of phrase, what high quality of Abrahams Lincolns mind or J.
Only in the treatment of a few facts and circumstances in Lincolns life, which might be regarded as capable of unfavorable interpretation, the book is less explicit and straightforward than might be desired.
It is not surprising, however, that, in the hands of iNicolay and Hay, a biography of Lincoln should have drifted into the tone of a eulogy. In the days of their early manhood, and during the most eventful period of his career, they had been his private secre- taries, and lived with him almost like members of his family.
What they will always regard and be proud to re- member as the most interesting part of their lives they had spent in the closest intimacy with him. They had shared his hopes, his labors, his triumphs, his anxieties, his sorrows.
They had known his aims to be high and his motives to be pure, when his policy and his acts were fiercely assailed. They had been under the strange charm of his sympa- thetic nature, his large humanity, when his manners were held up to ridicule, and his character was belittled and tra- duced.
Their story of him could hardly be anything but a work of filial love, painting every strong and noble feature in idealizing colors, and with reverential tenderness covering whatever might look like a blemish.
But Abraham Lincolns fame needed neither the reiterated enumeration of his virtues and abilities, nor any conceal- ment of his limitations and faults.
It was rather the weird mixture of quali- ties and powers in him, of the lofty with the common, the ideal with the uncouth, of that which he had become with that which he had not ceased to be, that made him so fascinating a character among his fellow-men, gave him his sin- gular power over their minds and hearts, and fitted him to be the greatest leader in the greatest crisis of our national life.
His was indeed a marvelous growth. The statesman or the military hero born and reared in a log cabin is a familiar figure in American history; but we may search in vain among our celebrities for one whose origin and early life equaled Abraham Lincolns in wretchedness.
He first saw the light in a miserable hovel in Kentucky, on a farm consisting of a few barren acres in a dreary neigh- borhood; his father a typical poor Southern white, shiftless and improvi- dent, without ambition for himself or his children, constantly looking for a new piece of land on which he might make a living without much work; his mother, in her youth handsome and bright, grown prematurely coarse in fea- ture and soured in mind by daily toil and care; the whole household squalid, cheerless, and utterly void of elevating inspirations.
Only when the family had moved into the malarious backwoods of Indiana, the mother had died, and a stepmother, a woman of thrift and en- ergy, had taken charge of the children, the shaggy-headed, ragged, barefooted, forlorn boy, then seven years old, be- gan to feel like a human being.
Hard work was his early lot. When a mere boy he had to help in supporting the family, either on his fathers clearing, or hired out to other farmers to plough, or dig ditches, or chop wood, or drive ox teams; occasionally also to tend the baby, when the farmers wife was otherwise engaged!The scholarships are made available by the State of Oklahoma, Cameron University, and private orga nizations through Cameron.
13 Scholarships are awarded on a competitive basis and based upon scholastic ability, financial need, demonstrated talent in individual studies, leadership, athletics or . Pieces should be grounded in the American South (any time period, pre-historic to modern; rural or urban) and should include elements of the fantastic / supernatural that come from Southern history, tradition, or folklore.
The young orator skilfully availed himself ed him to tre l circumstanc new light, and 'tS much appla a great many gst the Magis portunity offe s after, to just tate, and to ob first educationa new literary success, when he was charged in the year to pronounce in the name of the University, the funeral oration of the Empress aria Theresa.
However, he was a linguist and a literary scholar, and needed help; in the summer of , before the lectureship was instituted, he had asked a Scottish mathematician, John Craige, to tell him what books he would need to master in order to qualify himself for fol¬ lowing the Principia.
A reading of Eliot’s classic essay ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’ was first published in in the literary magazine The benjaminpohle.com was published in two parts, in the September and December issues.
Their respective essays ‘Tradition And The Individual Talent’ and ‘Modern Fiction’ serve only to underline the tremendous difference in the views of Eliot and Woolf with regard to .
by Pericles Lewis. T. S. Eliot expressed a typically ambivalent view of the past when he wrote in his essay “Tradition and the Individual Talent” ().The essay gives voice to the fact that modernist experiments seldom simply destroyed or rejected traditional methods of representation or traditional literary forms; rather, the modernists sought to enter into a . Their respective essays ‘Tradition And The Individual Talent’ and ‘Modern Fiction’ serve only to underline the tremendous difference in the views of Eliot and Woolf with regard to . Full text of "The high school English word-book [microform]: a manual of orthoepy, synonymy, and derivation" See other formats.