Very persuasive and moving.
At its most basic, strategy is simply a matter of figuring out what we need to achieve, determining the best way to use the resources at our disposal to achieve it, then executing the plan. Unfortunately, in the practical world of politics and war, none of these things are easily done. Our goals are complex, sometimes contradictory, and many-sided.
They often change in the middle of a war. The resources at our disposal are not always obvious, can change during the course of a struggle, and usually need to be adapted to suit our needs. And the enemy is often annoyingly uncooperative, refusing to fit our preconceptions of him or to stand still while we erect the apparatus for his destruction.
Let us start by analyzing one of the best known, most insightful, and least understood definitions of war ever written.
Most readers have seen it before, in one form or the other. Most military professionals accept this famous aphorism—albeit sometimes reluctantly—as a given truth. And yet, the words "policy" and "politics," as we use them in the English language, mean very different things.
The choice of one of these words over the other in translating Clausewitz's famous definition of war reflects a powerful psychological bias, a crucial difference in our views of the nature of reality. We must understand both relationships—between war and policy, and between war and politics.
To focus on the first without an appreciation for the second is to get a distorted notion of the fundamental character of war. War is a social phenomenon.
Its logic is not the logic of art, nor that of science or engineering, but rather the logic of social transactions.
Human beings, because they are intelligent, creative, and emotional, interact with each other in ways that are fundamentally different from the ways in which the scientist interacts with chemicals, the architect or engineer with beams and girders, or the artist with paints or musical notes.
The interaction we are concerned with when we speak of war is political interaction. The "other means" in Clausewitz's definition of war is organized violence. The addition of violence to political interaction is the only factor that defines war as a distinct form of politics—but that addition has powerful and unique effects.
While every specific war has its unique causes, which the strategist must strive to understand, war as a whole has no general cause other than mankind's innate desire for power. Thucydides, the ancient Greek historian of the disastrous Peloponnesian War, recounted an Athenian statement to that effect.
We have done nothing extraordinary, nothing contrary to human nature in accepting an empire when it was offered to us and then in refusing to give it up. Three very powerful motives prevent us from doing so—security, honor, and self-interest. It has always been a rule that the weak should be subject to the strong; and besides, we consider that we are worthy of our power.
The resort to naked force is the only way to determine the truth. Power is just as often psychological in nature: Power provides the means to attack, but it also provides the means to resist attack.
Power in itself is therefore neither good nor evil.
By its nature, however, power tends to be distributed unevenly, to an extent that varies greatly from one society to another and over time. Because of its many forms, different kinds of power tend to be found among different groups in most societies.The Taliban ban women from going outside without a man and Afghan women are forced to wear the burqa at all times in public.
Her family lost almost everything due to the bombings/wars in Afghanistan. a region as by virtue of its geographical location.
Geo political is defined as, stressing the influence of geographic factors on the state. Misc thoughts, memories, proto-essays, musings, etc. And on that dread day, the Ineffable One will summon the artificers and makers of graven images, and He will command them to give life to their creations, and failing, they and their creations will be dedicated to the flames.
Take our essay examples on Afghanistan and prepare your unique piece of writing.
At this category, you can scroll down numerous topic ideas and select the most interesting ones. For instance, you may write about Afghanistan war, its consequences, causes, reasons. UN News produces daily news content in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Kiswahili, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish, and weekly programmes in Hindi, Urdu and Bangla.
Our multimedia service, through this new integrated single platform, updates throughout the day, in text, audio and video – also making use of quality images and other media from across the UN system.
Afghanistan essays Afghanistan today is a disastrous state, it has a poor economy, people are dying of war and hunger. Afghanistan is not ruled by a government or a group of people. The majority of Afghanistan cities are under Taliban rule.
The exact population is not know but it is estimated. The Afghan War changed the Soviets leadership’s policies of using armed forces to impose political decisions, and additionally it is important to understand the culture and geography in order to better understand the victory of Afghanistan.
Preceding the attack on Afghanistan in late ’s the Soviet’s had previous success with invasions.